Stung, on 11 July 2012 - 08:15 AM, said:
The main problem I have with Brooke (and as such also with most of the other female wrestlers in TNA) is that they're selling themselves as pieces of talentless meat.
Brooke specifically?, false
Stung, on 11 July 2012 - 08:15 AM, said:
This business should be about selling yourself as a force to be reckoned either by skill or mindgames
Says who?, if that's how you feel personally, fine, but saying that's how it "should be" is opinion only. The business is about variety, if you have a roster where every female is based off of what you said, you end up with a bunch of clones, and it would get stale fast.
Stung, on 11 July 2012 - 08:15 AM, said:
But what does a Brooke or a Velvet do? Dress in skimpy outfits, shake their monyemakers and then proceed to embarrass themselves in the ring or on the mic, and the worst part is that it's successful because for some reason a lot of people seem to tune in to see TnA instead of TNA.
Going back to the variety, people watch wrestling for a variety of reasons, and seeing attractive women happens to be one of them. 1 of the reasons why these women got hired was because of their attractiveness. If it was just about being a great wrestler and nothing else, then we would be seeing much more unattractive women who im sure could put on a better match than Velvet & Brooke. Velvet does not embarrass herself on the mic, she's probably the best on the mic between all the females, and Brooke does not embarrass herself in the ring, as she has greatly improved, and I mean greatly literally.